Subscribe to Healthy Temple RSS Feed

The share foods - myths and actuality

Thu, Nov 29, 2007

Food, Recipes

eating

The “share food” is much popular. Some people use with goal loss, and another plain, for you care of the health. But old share victuals it can render our organism more robust? Similar experiments with the good health can be risky? Let us endeavor to understand.
The “share food” classic group theory Halbert Shaldan in the distant 1928 year has been offered by the American doctor, but reality is a flower in the XX second half-century to her. All products Shaldan separates to several groups that can blend, but other not. The groups: glair (meat, fish, kernels, a farmer, and oder.), carbohydrates (fresh fruits, sugar, bread, cereal foods, potatoes and oder), oils (all vegetable and animal oils), sour fruits (citrus, ananases, sour apples and oder). The abc inappropriate blends of products seem so according to Shaldan acid - carbohydrate, egg white - carbohydrate, egg white - oil, acid - egg white and etc. This is being understood, a scheme is merely estimated. The limits are much more actually. As being known, each group theory features supporters and reformers.


In the process of development the peptic tract is itself on the human it had adjusted namely to a mixed boarding. On the other hand her demotic recipes on preparation of food, had by ages and lot of generations okay, as well do not enter in the hypothesis of “share food” in none ways they board.
Assertion of Shaltan it is related with this that cause for most allergies is namely the get used fan food. But this is refuted by the doctors as well. They think that the allergy is immune disease that has any respect to the absorption and the succession of nutrition. Shaltan claims that this is unacceptable now for the coincident use of glair and oils. But specialists claim that there isn’t a complete thing pretty of this much. Contrarily, the glair self-bestir processing oils.

greek_salad

There have been specialists Im-only, that they believe the hypothesis of Shalten, but they calculate her as well for risky for the health. But I want immediately to fiddling that it regular unaffected gallop on refund they fall return, at on time is bleed lose bumpkinly on feed. The work matters there that at getting glair the organism disjoins one ferment in the preoccupation to carbohydrate-others of which. If that continues undernourished long, it the organism merely loses its brain to labour these ferments simultaneously, you to return to the “middle - of - the - road”. To return to the dbms, that is middle - of - the - road, of feeding it becomes much impossible.

, , , ,

This post was written by:

Asya - who has written 359 posts on The Healthy Temple.

Share this article with Your friends!

1 Comments For This Post

  1. Ivelina Says:

    An very interesting article. I like it.

Leave a Reply